There are a lot of opinions out there about polymer lower receivers. Some people love them, some people hate them. I think the truth lies somewhere in between.
Polymer lower receivers have some definite advantages over their aluminum counterparts. For one thing, they’re incredibly lightweight. This makes them ideal for building lighter-weight AR-15s, which can be a big advantage when you’re carrying your rifle around all day long.
They’re also very corrosion resistant, which is a big plus if you live in a humid climate or if you like to take your AR-15 out in the rain. And because they’re so easy to manufacture, they tend to be very affordable – often much cheaper than aluminum lowers.
On the downside, polymer lower receivers can be a bit more fragile than aluminum. They’re also not quite as rigid, which can impact accuracy if you’re shooting long-range. And because they’re relatively new to the market, there aren’t as many aftermarket parts and accessories available for them yet.
So, which is the right choice for you? It depends on your needs and preferences. If you want a lightweight, an affordable lower receiver that’s easy to find parts and accessories for, then an aluminum lower might be the way to go. But if you’re looking for maximum corrosion resistance or you’re building a budget AR-15, then a polymer lower could be the better choice.
No matter which type of lower receiver you choose, make sure you do your homework and buy from a reputable manufacturer. And always follow the installation instructions to the letter to ensure that your AR-15 is built correctly and safely.
Polymer lower receivers are becoming increasingly popular in the AR-15 world. There are several reasons for this, but chief among them is the fact that polymer lowers are often significantly lighter than their metal counterparts. This can be a big advantage when it comes to building a lightweight AR-15, and can also help to reduce felt recoil.
Another reason why polymer lower receivers have become so popular is that they tend to be much more affordable than their metal counterparts. This is especially true if you purchase your lower receiver as part of a kit, which will often include other required parts like the buttstock and trigger assembly.
Of course, there are some downsides to Polymer80 lowers as well. One is that they are not as strong or durable as a metal lower, so if you plan on doing any serious abuse with your rifle then a polymer lower may not be the best choice. Additionally, some people feel that polymer80 lowers do not have the same “quality feel” as a metal lower. This is purely subjective and ultimately comes down to personal preference.
If you’re looking for a lower receiver that is lightweight, affordable, and easy to assemble, then a Polymer80 lower may be the perfect choice for you. Just be aware of the potential downsides before you make your purchase.
There is a lot of debate on the internet about the merits of polymer lower receivers for AR-type rifles. the argument against them is that they are not as rugged or durable as their aluminum counterparts. Proponents assert that polymer lowers are every bit as tough and can be lighter than aluminum.
I am not going to take a side in this debate, but I will say that I have had good experiences with polymer lowers. I have a few friends who have built ARs with both types of lowers, and we have all had good results. My personal opinion is that if you are looking to save weight, go with a polymer lower. If you are more concerned about durability, go with an aluminum one. But ultimately, you decide to make it.
There are a few things to keep in mind if you do decide to go with a polymer lower. First, make sure that you get one from a reputable manufacturer. There are a lot of companies out there that make sub-par products, and you don’t want your lower to be one of them. Second, be sure to follow the instructions that come with the lower. The polymer can be a little tricky to work with, and if you don’t do it right, you could end up with a lower one that is not as strong as it should be.
In short, there are pros and cons to both aluminum and polymer lowers. It is up to you to decide which is right for your needs. Whichever one you choose, just be sure to do your research and buy from a reputable manufacturer.
There’s no simple answer to this question – it depends on a lot of factors. In general, however, polymer lower receivers can be just as strong and durable as their metal counterparts. Polymer is often lighter than metal, so a polymer lower receiver can help reduce the overall weight of your rifle. Polymer is also less prone to corrosion than metal, so it can offer better protection against the elements. Some shooters also find that polymer frames provide a smoother shooting experience. Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide whether a polymer lower receiver is right for your needs. Talk to other shooters, read reviews, and handle different types of firearms before making your decision.
Polymer lower receivers are becoming increasingly popular in the world of firearms. Several advantages come with using a polymer lower receiver. First, they are much lighter than their metal counterparts. This can be a major advantage when trying to reduce the overall weight of your firearm. Second, they are often more affordable than metal lowers. This can be a great option for those on a budget. Finally, polymer receivers tend to be more corrosion-resistant than metal receivers. This is an important consideration if you plan on using your firearm in tough conditions or exposing it to the elements regularly.
Overall, polymer lower receivers offer some clear advantages over their metal counterparts. However, it is important to keep in mind that they are not necessarily better in all respects. Each type of receiver has its strengths and weaknesses, so it is important to choose the one that is right for your specific needs.